Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 27.06.2025 01:11
What’s next?
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Trump airs frustrations with Xi and Jerome Powell over elusive economic goals - NBC News
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
They Were 8,000-Pound Sloths With Claws and Armor – Then Humans Showed Up - SciTechDaily
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Thank you.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Why is dating so frustrating and difficult for a guy?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Why do people procrastinate and how can they stop?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Just in the last 5 years:
Nintendo Switch 2 owners urged not to skip crucial step setting up their new consoles - GAMINGbible